This is one possible answer:
"Hume hand, in this text, the assumption that all ideas present in our understanding comes from a previous perception, ie a impression of sensation or reflection.
then is to get answers to the question of the origin of the idea of \u200b\u200bnecessary connection or causal connection, we find within our minds.
In response to this question, said that when looking at individual cases in which a phenomenon follows another, not on us any impression, and therefore no idea of \u200b\u200bnecessary connection between these two phenomena. However, if we are faced with many cases in which an object is repeated after another, then we perceive in our minds the idea of \u200b\u200bcause or necessary connection between them. In these cases, there is an impression of reflection (a feeling) that expresses a common connection (connection used) between two objects, and this impression is what gives rise to the idea of \u200b\u200bnecessary connection between cause and effect.
In conclusion, we can say that the author of the rejection of innate ideas in our thinking and tries to explain the origin of our idea of \u200b\u200bcausality from experience, that is, in some sense impression. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment